Gangstalking program explained


  • Criminal Harassment
  • What is “gang stalking?”
  • Crime Victim and Survivor Services
  • “Am I going crazy or am I being stalked?” Inside the disturbing online world of gangstalking
  • Criminal Harassment

    It does involve stalking though — intense, long-term surveillance and harassment, involving varying levels of criminality. In some cases, the harassment escalates to physical violence.

    As for the scope of such activities in the US or other nations, I have no specific information or guesses. This website does contain links, however, to most of the important published English language news reports related to this subject — through anyway. For reasons I try to address in my accompanying analysis, it seems clear that some of the published media reports — and most of the websites about this topic — are disinformation.

    Their existence suggests that this form of police state social control is at least widespread enough that an effort is being made to discredit claims about its existence. The disinformation goal is to associate all reports of such crimes with conspiracy theory idiocy — rather than associating them with the well-documented history of crimes by rogue spy agencies, police agencies, and private security firms in America, dating back to the 19th century.

    It clearly violates, for example, the U. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.

    The above article includes multiple references to another analyst, Mike Lofgren, with whom PDS mainly concurs on the nature of the deep state.

    Peter Dale Scott: Like myself, Lofgren suggests an ambiguous symbiosis between two aspects of the American deep state: 1 the Beltway agencies of the shadow government, like the CIA and NSA, which have been instituted by the public state and now overshadow it, and 2 the much older power of Wall Street, referring to the powerful banks and law firms located there. It is soldered by plutocracy, perpetual war, reduction of industrial capacity, US exceptionalism and political malfunction.

    Lofgren is a credible and welcome interpreter of how these factors combine to exert control over us. Also evident is his awareness of the particular threat to democracy posed by secret police agencies.

    When you get to the top, which is maybe a tenth of one percent, people essentially get what they want, i. But there are shafts of light. As always through history, there are two trajectories. One leads towards oppression and destruction. The other leads towards freedom and justice. Glennon regarding the deep state. And indifference to the threat that is emerging from these concealed institutions. That is where the energy for reform has to come from: the American people.

    Not from government. Government is very much the problem here. The people have to take the bull by the horns. These elements have proven themselves capable of perpetrating terrible crimes against dissidents at home and abroad. He was also, essentially, forced to resign from The New York Times, for speaking honestly, in public, about the moral and strategic idiocy of the Iraq War. For many years, Hedges has warned that America is governed by a corrupt, predatory elite, and that the U.

    It does not find its expression in a demagogue or charismatic leader but in the faceless anonymity of the corporate state. Our inverted totalitarianism pays outward fealty to the facade of electoral politics, the Constitution, civil liberties, freedom of the press, the independence of the judiciary, and the iconography, traditions and language of American patriotism, but it has effectively seized all of the mechanisms of power to render the citizen impotent.

    There is the visible government—the White House, Congress, the courts, state legislatures and governorships—and the invisible government, or deep state, where anonymous technocrats, intelligence operatives, generals, bankers, corporations and lobbyists manage foreign and domestic policy regardless of which political party holds a majority.

    They are the vanguard of the invisible government. Frank Church and the leaking of photographs of prisoners being tortured at Abu Ghraib in Iraq. The ends always justify the means. Anything, no matter how immoral or criminal, is permissible. Here, for example, is a map of corporate donations to police departments and organizations.

    Although some of the strategies and tactics associated with counterintelligence operations are used by private security personnel, for example, on behalf of corporate clients, they are most frequently used by government intelligence agencies.

    There is usually a domestic counterintelligence service, usually part of a larger organization such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the United States. Often though, the tactics are in a grey area of dubious legality. The U. Edgar Hoover. In addition to performing legitimate law enforcement activities, such as infiltrating criminal organizations, LEIUs have been used since the late s to spy on and disrupt groups which are viewed as subversive by corporations and politicians.

    They adopted the name Law Enforcement Intelligence Unit. Based on their history, their reported connections with U. During the past decade or so, numerous job advertisements for SRPs have been posted by military contractors. From the advertisements, it is clear that the jobs involve some type of domestic intelligence operations, but the specific elements of the job are never described. Nearly one-third of the Americans with top secret clearances are private contractors, rather than government employees.

    Whether SRPs are engaged in stalking some of their fellow citizens will probably remain a mystery in the near future. People who like easy money — and who are afraid to violate their security clearances — are far more plentiful in America than individuals with the courage and integrity needed to become whistle-blowers. For example, if there is no legal basis for arresting and prosecuting someone, and assassination is not a legal or practical option, an alternative is a long-term campaign of intense surveillance and harassment.

    Additional revelations in recent years include news reports — and a U. Senate report — which showed that the CIA and its contractors torture people and lie about it.

    Such revelations, among many others, add plausibility to reports by self-proclaimed victims of organized stalking. In some cases, as with blacklisting, the motive for disruption activities can simply be revenge by the people who initiated the process, rather than a belief that the target actually poses a threat.

    A criminal defense attorney stated that many of her clients complained of harassment by authorities, although they were never arrested. In November , a classified U. A disruption is the result of direct actions and may include but is not limited to the arrest; seizure of assets; or impairing the operational capabilities of key threat actors. A disruption strategy seeks to terrorize and socially isolate the victim, and to degrade his or her financial and emotional status — as well as inflicting the various physical effects of perpetual stress.

    Sometimes the word appears in the English language press; for example, in October , The Sunday Times, a major newspaper in the U. Very likely, the term was coined by U. Disruption operations are not perpetrated by criminal gangs, so the term is possibly intended to obfuscate the nature of the spying and harassment. Even apparently-legitimate accounts of this form of spying and harassment often include the term. In addition, private investigators and other security contractors are subject to even less oversight than official enforcers.

    The following statistical trend could be an example of that, but it is impossible to make confident inferences from it. The graph below was generated via the Google Trends webpage in May Department of Justice DOJ crime statistics from a survey indicated that an estimated , stalking victims reported being stalked by 3 or more perpetrators. Page 12 of the report has the relevant numbers: A crime survey of England and Wales found that 12 percent of stalking victims reported being stalked by 3 perpetrators page In the British survey, that group was approximately 8 percent of all stalking victims page That would be approximately 1 percent 0.

    Here is Mr. Make of it what you will, but the U. Department of Justice never publicly discusses the issue of counterintelligence stalking — not even to dismiss it as nonsense.

    Yet there is no mention of such crimes by the federal government anywhere except in those statistics. The implication is inescapable: federal agencies are acquiescing in what is happening. And it is being done illegally — as it violates state laws in every state against stalking as well as the U. Stalking is also a violation of federal law U. Code Title 18, Section A.

    This is also true of the vast industry of private contractors employed by those agencies. Similarly, judges who sit on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA court which reviews legal issues about secret federal policies are also bound by secrecy oaths. That is also true of members of the House and Senate intelligence committees.

    Consequently, an agent who tries to reveal unethical behavior by the agency faces potentially serious legal consequences. Contractors of intelligence agencies are also not protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act.

    These are things which happen to everyone. But for gang stalking victims, these things happen constantly — which becomes a form of real psychological torture, the intensity of which must be experienced to comprehend. This is not surprising; nearly three-quarters of Americans do not know what the Cold War was about, and 29 percent cannot even name the vice president.

    Counterintelligence operations can thrive in an environment of such widespread ignorance. Still, it can only make things easier for an agency such as the FBI to recruit vigilante citizen volunteers and to conduct illegal operations without detection when they are dealing with a society in which 64 percent of the public cannot name the three branches of their federal government and a fourth of the people do not even know that the earth revolves around the sun.

    There are some notable exceptions — most frequently in the local and alternative press. I review those in detail throughout this website, but as a rule, major corporate news agencies avoid discussing matters which the intelligence and law enforcement community do not wish to have discussed. Laziness in the news media should not be underestimated either. For perspective, one has to re-consider the reporting on crimes by U.

    A book by historian Kathryn S. Olmsted, Challenging the Secret Government , makes the case that Americans overestimate the boldness of the journalism during that period. As a result, we missed a golden opportunity to fully expose the deep corruption in the U. Olmsted, a lecturer in history at U. This is a fascinating study of how, just months after Watergate, both press and Congress quietly retreated to the same silk-gloved handling of the CIA and FBI in the name of national security.

    Only people within Google know the exact policies and algorithms which determine those results, but the search results do provide a rough indication of the online presence of certain topics.

    Typically, the list of websites generated by a search is the tip of an iceberg.

    She was born in Baltimore in and had a happy, healthy childhood—her younger brother Danny fondly recalls the treasure hunts she would orchestrate and the elaborate plays she would write and perform with her siblings.

    In her late teens, she developed anorexia and depression and was hospitalized for a month. Despite her struggles, she graduated high school and was accepted into a prestigious liberal arts college.

    There, things went downhill again. Among other issues, chronic fatigue led her to drop out. Over the next several years, she moved across the country sporadically and spontaneously—she began bouncing from Florida, where Danny lives, to Baltimore to see her grandmother, to Virginia, to Washington, DC, sometimes living in her car.

    At 30, after experiencing delusions that she was pregnant, she was diagnosed with schizophrenia. She was hospitalized for half a year and began treatment, regularly receiving shots of an antipsychotic drug. For the next five or six years, Jenny led a remarkable and productive life. She worked for the National Association of Mental Illness, was on the board for the National Organisation for Women, volunteered regularly, tutored college kids, and wrote a book.

    The judge who granted the order told Jenny she had to get a psychological evaluation within a year. She was dead within two months. Targeted individuals claim that seemingly ordinary people are in fact trained operatives tasked with watching or harassing them—delivery men, neighbors, colleagues, roommates, teachers, even dogs. And though small compared with the most popular online forums, gangstalking communities are growing quickly; one estimate from suggested that there might be 10, people in such groups across the internet.

    Today, just one subreddit and one Facebook group adds up to over 22, —and there are hundreds more groups scattered across different platforms. Every day, the internet legitimizes these beliefs. Her illness sometimes manifested as elaborate fictions where Jenny was the victim of some shadowy conspiracy—though she had once attempted to join the Church of Scientology, she also believed the organization was monitoring her and using technology of some sort to torture her in her apartment.

    But Danny believes it played a role. According to Danny, Jenny sometimes struggled with her medication. She built up tolerance to her antipsychotics, he says, and her mental health would often deteriorate when she switched medication.

    There is plenty of evidence that the online forums Jenny frequented and digital circles she ran in can be damaging. In a Reddit post from two years ago, a user explains how he was diagnosed with schizophrenia and initially attempted to resist the diagnosis due to his belief in gangstalking.

    He describes his relief upon taking antipsychotics and finding the stalking stopped. Some claim that gangstalkers are trying to drive their victims mad in order to delegitimize them. After witnessing a rape at a fraternity, he began losing sleep; his situation was exacerbated by a breakup and school-related stress.

    Harry came to believe he was being stalked, filmed, and whispered about—on multiple occasions, he screamed at strangers to stop following him. Eventually, he was institutionalized for a month and diagnosed as bipolar. Still, the forum made him angry. While working as a psychiatrist in a New York City hospital just over 15 years ago, Joel Gold encountered five separate people who believed they were the star of their own reality TV program that was broadcast around the world.

    In it they argue that delusions are shaped by society, and that the world around us influences the form psychosis takes. Gold says many of his patients with the Truman Show delusion only came to believe they were a TV star after they had watched the movie, with many of them explicitly referencing the film as a moment of enlightenment. In the Reddit post where the user described antipsychotics stopping his delusions, there were also supportive comments alongside the negative ones.

    Harry, the young man who tried to offer a voice of dissent on a gangstalking subreddit, says that despite receiving negative comments, a handful of people messaged him privately for help. I thought I could use my experience as a way to help.

    FBI Others argue that any benefits that may come from such sites are outweighed by the real-world harm that could result from stoking belief in gangstalking. A few years ago, he joined the mailing list of a man who believed he was a targeted individual.

    He left behind a note on his computer in which he claimed he was being controlled by low frequency electromagnetic waves. In a separate instance in , a lawyer in New Mexico filmed a video about his experiences being gangstalked by the government before shooting and injuring three people. Some on gangstalking forums encourage one another to act on their delusions. In another, someone threatens to shoot at drones.

    How can someone distinguish delusions from conspiracies fed by misinformation? Celebrities such as actor Woody Harrelson and boxer Amir Khan have spread the conspiracy, while broadband engineers have been attacked and threatened. Burn those who created them! Not everyone who frequents gangstalking forums is clinically paranoid or experiencing persecutory delusions, of course, just as everyone who visits 5G conspiracy forums cannot be declared free of psychosis.

    Yet both phenomena highlight how the internet can legitimize and spread fringe beliefs. He estimates that she logged on to at least one gangstalking forum every day. Reddit itself bans subreddits that explicitly encourage or incite violence, but gangstalking subs do not violate any of its current policies. We will take action against any content which violates our policies, and encourage people to use our reporting tools for any posts they are concerned about.

    In a Reddit post from two years ago, a user explains how he was diagnosed with schizophrenia and initially attempted to resist the diagnosis due to his belief in gangstalking. He describes his relief upon taking antipsychotics and finding the stalking stopped. Some claim that gangstalkers are trying to drive their victims mad in order to delegitimize them.

    After witnessing a rape at a fraternity, he began losing sleep; his situation was exacerbated by a breakup and school-related stress. Harry came to believe he was being stalked, filmed, and whispered about—on multiple occasions, he screamed at strangers to stop following him. Eventually, he was institutionalized for a month and diagnosed as bipolar. Still, the forum made him angry. While working as a psychiatrist in a New York City hospital just over 15 years ago, Joel Gold encountered five separate people who believed they were the star of their own reality TV program that was broadcast around the world.

    In it they argue that delusions are shaped by society, and that the world around us influences the form psychosis takes. Gold says many of his patients with the Truman Show delusion only came to believe they were a TV star after they had watched the movie, with many of them explicitly referencing the film as a moment of enlightenment.

    In the Reddit post where the user described antipsychotics stopping his delusions, there were also supportive comments alongside the negative ones. Harry, the young man who tried to offer a voice of dissent on a gangstalking subreddit, says that despite receiving negative comments, a handful of people messaged him privately for help.

    I thought I could use my experience as a way to help. FBI Others argue that any benefits that may come from such sites are outweighed by the real-world harm that could result from stoking belief in gangstalking. A few years ago, he joined the mailing list of a man who believed he was a targeted individual.

    He left behind a note on his computer in which he claimed he was being controlled by low frequency electromagnetic waves. Legal definitions of stalking differ depending on where you live; however stalking is a crime under the laws of all 50 states, varicose testicles symptoms District of Columbia, the U.

    Territories, and the Federal government. Stalking is serious, often violent, and can escalate over time. What is Stalking? While there is no universal set of steps that will work for everyone, these actions may help you feel in control of your life again: Call for Immediate Assistance — You know yourself and your situation better than anyone. Trust your instincts and call for help if you feel you are in danger. That would be approximately 1 percent 0.

    Here is Mr. Make of it what you will, but the U. Department of Justice never publicly discusses the issue of counterintelligence stalking — not even to dismiss it as nonsense. Yet there is no mention of such crimes by the federal government anywhere except in those statistics. The implication is inescapable: federal agencies are acquiescing in what is happening.

    And it is being done illegally — as it violates state laws in every state against stalking as well as the U. Stalking is also a violation of federal law U. Code Title 18, Section A. This is also true of the vast industry of private contractors employed by those agencies. Similarly, judges who sit on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA court which reviews legal issues about secret federal policies are also bound by secrecy oaths. That is also true of members of the House and Senate intelligence committees.

    Consequently, an agent who tries to reveal unethical behavior by the agency faces potentially serious legal consequences.

    Contractors of intelligence agencies are also not protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act. These are things which happen to everyone.

    But for gang stalking victims, these things happen constantly — which becomes a form of real psychological torture, the intensity of which must be experienced to comprehend. This is not surprising; nearly three-quarters of Americans do not know what the Cold War was about, and 29 percent cannot even name the vice president. Counterintelligence operations can thrive in an environment of such widespread ignorance. Still, it can only make things easier for an agency such as the FBI to recruit vigilante citizen volunteers and to conduct illegal operations without detection when they are dealing with a society in which 64 percent of the public cannot name the three branches of their federal government and a fourth of the people do not even know that the earth revolves around the sun.

    There are some notable exceptions — most frequently in the local and alternative press. I review those in detail throughout this website, but as a rule, major corporate news agencies avoid discussing matters which the intelligence and law enforcement community do not wish to have discussed. Laziness in the news media should not be underestimated either.

    What is “gang stalking?”

    For perspective, one has to re-consider the reporting on crimes by U. A book by historian Kathryn S. Olmsted, Challenging the Secret Governmentmakes the case that Americans overestimate the boldness of the journalism during that period. As a result, we missed a golden opportunity to fully expose the deep corruption in the U.

    Olmsted, a lecturer in history at U. This is a fascinating study of how, just months after Watergate, both press and Congress quietly retreated to the same silk-gloved handling of the CIA and FBI in the name of national security. Only people within Google know the exact policies and algorithms which determine those results, but the search results do provide a rough indication of the online presence of certain topics.

    Typically, the list of websites generated by a search is the tip of an iceberg. Ten pages of website links will show the top results, but the screen also displays a much larger number that indicates the number of references to the search term that were detected.

    As you begin to wade through the search results, you will mostly encounter websites filled with incoherent rubbish. Anyone even superficially familiar with counterintelligence will recognize this tactic; it is called disinformation. Disinformation is used to muddy the waters surrounding the topic wherever it is discussed online. The intent is to mitigate exposure of the operations. Because of its central importance to counterintelligence generally — and organized stalking in particular — I explore the subject of disinformation at length in its own section of this overview and elsewhere in this website.

    On the other hand, very few people see most of those reports — let alone all of them together and combined with the context provided by the analysis you are now reading.

    Unfortunately, very few civilians ever see that evidence all grouped together, and therefore they are very unlikely to realize what is happening. Citizens of the U. Among the secret documents revealed by NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden, for example, were presentation slides about how the NSA assisted its British equivalent, GCHQ, in developing technology that was used to spy on citizens via their webcams. In the same way that the U.

    As far as I know, the members of Parliament did not hold much public discussion about how the U. Here is an example of such abuse which was reported in the news media — partly because it was directed at members of the news media. One of the counterintelligence tactics which the federal government hires intelligence contractors to perform is spreading disinformation.

    If you criticize a comedian, you will likely become the target of a joke. Websites were registered in their names….

    Crime Victim and Survivor Services

    Slander is just one of the tactics used in organized stalking by counterintelligence operations. Any or all of the tactics — which are described in detail in a section of this overview — could be used as a weapon by people in the business.

    In theory, an organized stalking operation against an individual could be initiated by anyone familiar with the tactics who has associates willing to participate. Perpetrators with financial resources could easily employ private investigators, for example, and others with relevant technical skills to wage a sophisticated operation against someone for revenge or intimidation. Someone with connections to current or former law enforcement or intelligence agency personnel — or military personnel with a background in intelligence — could mount a very serious campaign against a victim without even officially involving government agencies in the initial stages of the investigation and harassment.

    That evidence could then be used to justify the initiation of more formal scrutiny by a government agency. At whatever point at which it becomes useful or necessary, the perpetrators can — officially or unofficially — turn over to the government counterintelligence personnel whatever they have gathered to have the individual targeted more formally.

    Similarly, being a member of the FBI-corporate alliance called InfraGard discussed in detail below could create a perfect opportunity to have someone blacklisted. Allegations that the ongoing criminal harassment of targeted individuals is simply an activity by one or more vigilante groups is a case in point. It is inconceivable — especially with the modern surveillance state — that the Justice Department and the other federal intelligence agencies are unaware of exactly what is happening.

    Their silence about the issue means that they acquiesce in it, whatever the specific operational structure might be. Perpetrators of gang stalking crimes rely upon a degree of informal support from sadists and useful idiots.

    Also, there is a long history of non-governmental organizations perpetrating very serious crimes against their fellow citizens. In addition, such organizations — for example, the Ku Klux Klan — have historically included members of the political and law enforcement community. So the involvement of private groups in organized stalking cannot be categorically dismissed, even though the core of the activity has to be state-sanctioned.

    See for example, this March 15, article in the Brisbane Times.

    “Am I going crazy or am I being stalked?” Inside the disturbing online world of gangstalking

    During one investigation, headed by a former Los Angeles police sergeant, the church paid tens of thousands of dollars to reputed organized crime figures and con men for information linking a leading church opponent to a crime that it turned out he did not commit.

    That is perhaps true for most of the general public since most people are completely unaware of the existence of any domestic counterintelligence operations — past or present — and would be unlikely to suspect that what they are being told might be disinformation and manipulation as part of a modern American version of the Stasi. One group which is sometimes mentioned as a source of organized stalking perpetrators — probably as disinformation in most cases — is the ancient fraternal order of Freemasons.

    Mentioning the organization often brings to mind tin-foil hat conspiracy theories. It should be noted, however, that mainstream news reports also include allegations about the group. This June article in The Independent revealed that a leaked secret report from British law enforcement authorities found that many law firms, wealthy individuals, and large corporations hire private investigators to conduct illegal spying for them.

    In the case described, local and federal law enforcement officials were feeding information to a private, right-wing political organization. Almost one-third of those top secret clearances belong to contractors rather than government employees. Although the budget for U. This is especially clear after revelations in about the scope of domestic surveillance by the National Security Agency NSA.

    Equally clear is that the U. A common — and accurate — critique of the modern U. A related problem is that the now-vast network of federal agencies whose officials of course are non-elected operate with minimal accountability. In many cases they effectively create their own laws. This is true to some extent in all agencies since they issue and enforce regulations, but the potential to be corrupted by power is infinitely greater in law enforcement and intelligence agencies such as the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA — which operate mostly in secrecy.

    Eisenhower Even Eisenhower was corrupted by the kind of power he warned against. In Iran, a democratically-elected prime minister was overthrown by the CIA and its British counterpart MI6and replaced by a monarchy. The CIA also trained the repressive police force used to maintain the dictatorship.

    Similarly, in Guatemala, the CIA overthrew a democratically-elected president and installed a military dictatorship. In both cases, the motives were corporate greed and the desire for U. The collusion between corporations and the federal government in the area of domestic surveillance is inherently dangerous. The people can fight Big Government. The people can fight Big Finance.

    The people can fight Big Tech. Booz Allen Hamilton is paid handsomely to spy on us for the government, then pours campaign contributions back into that same government, protecting their powerful financial incentive to have the surveillance state expand, something that is already a bipartisan cause. There will always be a long line of contractors seeking to cash-in. They all want to be IG Farben sort of the gold standard of war pigs. Americans are not normally permitted to know how much of their money the federal government spends on spying.

    NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden changed that. You can buy a lot of traitorous Stasi rodents with that kind of money. Also be aware that a lot more money is sloshing around in the federal pig trough which might be getting funneled into spying activities. Many U. Pentagon spending is notoriously difficult to keep track of. Even the U.

    Government Accounting Office says that U. The Washington Post articles upon which the documentary was based were the product of one of the most thorough investigations of the American police state. More than a dozen journalists spent two years investigating the vast network of agencies and corporations performing secret homeland security operations.

    It has hired private contractors by the tens of thousands, creating corporate spies, corporate analysts, corporate mercenaries, corporate builders, and corporate providers for a structure that is increasingly be coming the profit-center of a state within a state. A January article by Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone examined the accounting rules used to obfuscate federal spending on intelligence activities. It also expressly allows federal agencies to refrain from telling taxpayers if and when public financial statements have been altered.

    Activities revealed in those leaked emails included things such as plotting to discredit journalist Glenn Greenwald and critics of the Chamber of Commerce by spreading lies about them. In other words, at least some of these numerous secret firms engage in the kind of actions which the CIA might perform against foreign enemies — but they do so on behalf of corporate interests.

    Here is an excellent article by Barrett Brown on this topic published in the Guardian in July On August 21, Drudge Report linked to a brief article posted the day before on InfoWars about a job announcement posted in San Diego.

    They are mainly found on the websites of defense contractors. All of the job listings specify that applicants must have active secret clearances and counterintelligence training. I have so far been unable to locate any mainstream news reports that might shed light on this issue, but multiple indications suggest that these could be jobs for gang stalkers. Here is an example of one such job listing: Click on image to enlarge. Proper preparation for the interview will minimize the risk of embarrassment.

    The InfraGard leadership and the local FBI representative should review ring gender test miscarriage submitted questions, agree on the predilection of the answers, and identify the appropriate interviewee. Tailor answers to the expected audience. Questions concerning sensitive information should be avoided.

    The relevant section begins 25 minutes into this video clip. That speculation is made more difficult by the fact that the people who are overtly and covertly watching them and perpetrating various acts of harassment are of different classes of perpetrators with different motivations and have different connections and often no connection to the victim. Their interactions with the target require no technical skills; the perp is just following some simple instruction — for example, to bump into the victim, or to make some specific creepy comment, or to harass the victim at his or her residence by making various noises.

    Such participants in the stalking of course would not be told anything about who they are ultimately working for; in some cases perhaps they are simply paid a small sum of cash by a person who approached them on the street to perform a single act of harassment.


    Gangstalking program explained